Published on 30 October 2023
FOURTH SECTION
Application no. 41809/21
Dmitriy Vadimovich SELYAYEV and Denis Vadimovich SELYAYEV against Russia
and 39 other applications
(see list appended)
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 5 October 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.
In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).
For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website.
SUBJECT MATTER
The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).
APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
41809/21*
30/07/2021
Dmitriy Vadimovich SELYAYEV
1996
Denis Vadimovich SELYAYEV
1993
Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova
Kolomna
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000 for each applicant
Moscow City Court
16/04/2021 (decision in respect of the applicant, Denis Seyayev) and 21/05/2021 (decision in respect of the applicant Dmitriy Selyayev)
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicants’ conviction was based.
41824/21*
02/08/2021
Aleksandr Maksimovich POTAPOV
2002
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
16/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based; inability to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf.
41830/21*
02/08/2021
Ilya Vladislavovich DMITRIYEV
1979
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
16/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report and detention at the police station on 01/02/2021 for 5 hours after compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings – no possibility to adduce evidence;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based; inability to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
41834/21*
02/08/2021
Vyacheslav Vladimirovich
POPOV
1988
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 7 days
Moscow City Court
03/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021, when the applicant was taken to the Babushkinskiy District Court;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - no possibility to adduce evidence;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
41843/21*
02/08/2021
Vladislav
Romanovich ANDREYEV
1997
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 12 days
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
41967/21*
31/07/2021
Olga Nikolayevna ZABALUYEVA
1982
Vitaliy Dmitriyevich Tykhta
Khabarovsk
Rally to support S. Furgal
Khabarovsk
19/12/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Khabarovsk Regional Court
02/02/2021
41969/21*
03/08/2021
Danil Faritovich IBRAGIMOV
1992
Rushan Rafisovich Kabirov
Kazan
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Rdepublic
24/03/2021
42185/21*
03/08/2021
Aygul Igorevna TUKTAROVA
1996
Rushan Rafisovich Kabirov
Kazan
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 02/02/2021.
42304/21*
04/08/2021
Inga Alanovna KELEKHSAYEVA
1995
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
08/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based; inability to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on her behalf;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
42313/21*
04/08/2021
Anastasiya
Sergeyevna ZAYTSEVA
1998
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 5 days
Moscow City Court
18/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12 a.m. until 8.00 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
57235/21*
15/11/2021
Vladislav
Andreyevich SHULTSEV
1995
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
17/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
57245/21*
15/11/2021
Sergey Borisovich MURAVYEV
1991
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
11/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
57247/21*
15/11/2021
Yuriy Pavlovich PASTUSHENKO
1985
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
21/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
57255/21*
15/11/2021
Daniil Vladimirovich KOROTOVSKIKH
1990
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kurgan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Kurgan Regional Court
24/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
57339/21*
10/11/2021
Tatyana Yevgenyevna TERESHCHENKOVA
1984
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Ryazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Ryazan Regional Court
02/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
57521/21*
18/11/2021
Nodari Lotariyevich KHANANASHVILI
1957
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Municipal Russia", organised by Open Russia Civic Movement
Moscow
13/03/2021
article 20.33 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Izmaylovskiy District Court of Moscow
20/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
57576/21*
10/11/2021
Ivan Vladimirovich TALALAYEV
1982
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
57603/21*
10/11/2021
Maksim Andreyevich BOLYAVIN
1996
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
57606/21*
18/11/2021
Ivan Vladimirovich BAKHTINOV
1985
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
21/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
57614/21*
18/11/2021
Lyubov Sergeyevna FILIPCHIK
1988
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
57619/21*
10/11/2021
Kirill Rodionovich IZHOV
1995
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
13/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
57631/21*
10/11/2021
Aleksandr Igorevich BESSMERTNYY
1997
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
57637/21*
10/11/2021
Zarina Ruslanova IDRISOVA
1997
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalny"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 5 days
Moscow City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from12 a.m. until 8 a.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based; inability to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on the applicant’s behalf;
Art. 6 (3) (c) - own choice of legal assistance - absence of a lawyer in police station and in the District Court.
57644/21*
10/11/2021
Yelena Vasilyevna ALENICHEVA
1973
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
13/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings – no possibility to adduce evidence or question defence witnesses;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
57708/21*
26/10/2021
Aleksandr Valeryevich TSAPKO
1999
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Rostov-on Don
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 13 days
Rostov Regional Court
28/04/2021
57722/21*
26/10/2021
Dmitriy Aleksandrovich TSIBIREV
1986
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Saratov
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
detention for 20 days
Saratov Regional Court
27/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
57791/21*
11/11/2021
Aleksandr Vyacheslavovich BARYSHEV
1980
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
57842/21*
11/11/2021
Anna Viktorovna IVANOVA-DYATLOVA
1961
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
13/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
57871/21*
11/11/2021
Tatyana Aleksandrovna LUKYANOVA
1971
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
57876/21*
11/11/2021
Lyudmila Vladimirovna DOBRYNINA
1955
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Khabarovsk
18/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Khabarovsk Regional Court
13/05/2021
58289/21*
13/11/2021
Lyubov Maksimovna KNELS
2000
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Novosibirsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Novosibirsk Regional Court
14/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
58331/21*
18/11/2021
Petr Sergeyevich MIRONENKO
1993
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
58779/21*
25/11/2021
Andrey Gennadyevich NEFEDKIN
1974
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 7 days
Moscow City Court
07/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
58793/21*
25/11/2021
Alena Yuryevna MILANOVICH
1991
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
27/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - no possibility to adduce evidence;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
58800/21*
25/11/2021
Aleksandra Nikolayevna SYSHCHIKOVA
1993
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
27/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
58808/21*
25/11/2021
Aleksandr Vladimirovich GONTAREV
1991
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
13/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
59386/21
25/11/2021
Mariya Vladilenovna TIVIKOVA
1978
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Vladimir
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 5,000
Vladimir Regional Court
29/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
59442/21*
25/11/2021
Anton Anatolyevich TAROYANTS
1998
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Municipal Russia", organised by Open Russia Civic Movement
Moscow
13/03/2021
article 20.33 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Izmailovskiy District Court of Moscow
28/05/2021
59443/21*
25/11/2021
Nikolay Vladimirovich CHAK
1987
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Khabarovsk
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Khabarovsk Regional Court
01/07/2021
59450/21*
25/11/2021
Vladislav Yevgenyevich MASS
1996
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
15/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy