FIRST SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 42530/10
Kamil SIODŁOWSKI
against Poland
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 12 December 2017 as a Committee composed of:
Aleš Pejchal, President,
Krzysztof Wojtyczek,
Jovan Ilievski, judges,
and Renata Degener, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 7 July 2010,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
1. The applicant, Mr Kamil Siodłowski, is a Polish national, who was born in 1959 and was detained in Dobrowo.
2. The applicant’s complaint about the length of the criminal proceedings against him (Article 6 § 1 of the Convention) was communicated to the Polish Government, who were represented by their Agent, Ms J. Chrzanowska, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
3. The communication letter of 27 July 2015, sent to the Dobrowo Prison, has been returned to the Court with the information of his new home address, since on 13 May 2015 the applicant had been released on parole. On 26 August 2015, the communication letter was sent to this address but returned undelivered, with an annotation on the envelope: “the addressee does not live there”. On 16 June 2016 the Registry sent his another letter, by registered post, reminding the applicant that the period allowed for submission of his comments on the Government’s unilateral declaration had expired on 11 May 2016. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention and a fresh time-limit was fixed at 15 July 2016. This letter was returned undelivered. The most recent Registry’s letter, of 14 December 2016, sent to the Dobrowo Prison, was also returned undelivered, with the annotation on the envelope that the addressee was not detained there.
4. The applicant has not kept any contact with the Court since his last letter from October 2014.
THE LAW
5. The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.
6. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 11 January 2018.
Renata DegenerAleš Pejchal
Deputy RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy