FOURTH SECTION
DECISION
This version was rectified on 13 September 2016 under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court.
Application no. 47022/14
Alin Daniel IUGA against Romania
and 11 other applications
(see list appended)
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 2 June 2016 as a Committee composed of:
Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,
Egidijus Kūris,
Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, judges,
and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”).
The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Romania in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 23 June 2016.
Hasan BakırcıVincent A. De Gaetano
Deputy RegistrarPresident
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
(inadequate conditions of detention)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant name
Date of birth
Representative name and location
Date of receipt of Government declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant
(in euros)[i]
47022/14
21/07/2014
Alin Daniel IUGA
29/01/1982
04/05/2016
25/03/2016
4,200
47599/14
16/12/2014
Auraș-Culiță CIUCĂ[1]
16/07/1974
25/09/2015
22/04/2016
3,000
48941/14
25/08/2014
Shimon NAOR
19/10/1949
Peter Irina Maria
Bucuresti
26/04/2016
18/03/2016
8,700
6789/15
28/01/2015
Augustin PINTEA
21/08/1952
10/03/2016
29/04/2016
4,100
7613/15
17/03/2015
Nelu CRĂCIUN
17/02/1980
04/05/2016
03/02/2016
3,200
19935/15
14/04/2015
Ion BĂCAN
27/07/1950
04/05/2016
08/03/2016
9,300
29860/15
07/09/2015
Sever-Marius ACHIMAŞ
03/07/1982
10/05/2016
26/04/2016
4,800
30441/15
05/08/2015
Marian PENE
04/04/1983
10/05/2016
27/04/2016
5,100
31131/15
15/07/2015
Marius-Oliver BADEA
31/03/1990
Peter Irina Maria
Bucuresti
06/05/2016
31/03/2016
6,500
44684/15
28/08/2015
Marian BOICEA
26/06/1968
04/05/2016
05/02/2016
3,800
49490/15
01/10/2015
Viorel KIRA
22/04/1969
04/05/2016
27/01/2016
3,500
49920/15
29/09/2015
Viorel SĂVULESCU
22/11/1965
04/05/2016
04/04/2016
3,000
[1] Rectified on 13 September 2016: the text was “ 16/06/1974 “.
[i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy