.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt }.s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right }.sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }.s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify }.s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt }.s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid }.s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid }.s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }.s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt }.s25D5DE94 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt }.s1DE04B9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt }
Published on 21 October 2024
FIFTH SECTION
Application no. 54853/22
Lado ULUMBERASHVILI
against Georgia
lodged on 5 November 2022
communicated on 2 October 2024
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The application concerns the length of a labour dispute which the applicant initiated on 6 March 2019. At the time of the submission of the application, the proceedings were still pending before the first instance court.
Relying on Articles 6 § 1 of the Convention the applicant complains about the length of the relevant proceedings.
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES
Is the length of the civil proceedings in the present case in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy