FIFTH SECTION
[PARTIAL] [FINAL] DECISION
Application no. 42474/04
by Olga Nikolayevna VORONKO
against Ukraine
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 6 June 2006 as a Chamber composed of:
MrP. Lorenzen, President,
MrK. Jungwiert,
MrV. Butkevych,
MrsM. Tsatsa-Nikolovska,
MrR. Maruste,
MrJ. Borrego Borrego,
MrsR. Jaeger, judges,
and Mrs C. Westerdiek, Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 19 July 2004,
Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits of the case together,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
THE FACTS
The applicant, Ms Olga Nikolayevna Voronko, is a Ukrainian national who was born in 1968 and lives in the village of Bolshoye, Belgorod region, Russia. She was represented before the Court by Mr V. Bychkovskiy. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Mrs V. Lutkovska and Mr Y. Zaytsev, and Mrs I. Shevchuk, Head of the Office of the Government Agent before the European Court of Human Rights.
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
In 2003 the applicant instituted proceedings in the Krasnoluchskiy Town Court against her former employer, the Knyagininskaya State Mining Company (Шахта «Княгининская» ГХК «Донбассантрацит»), for salary arrears and compensation for moral damage. On 5 June 2003 the court awarded the applicant UAH 3,622.45[1] (Решение Краснолучского городского суда Луганской области).
In July 2003 the Krasnoluchskiy Town Bailiffs’ Service (Городской отдел Государственной исполнительной службы Краснолучского городского управления юстиции) initiated enforcement proceedings. However, the judgment was not enforced, allegedly due to the failure of the Bailiffs’ Service to act in not selling the property of the Mining Company.
By letter of 2 June 2004, the Bailiffs’ Service informed the applicant that the debtor’s accounts had been seized but that it was impossible to dispose of the debtor’s property because the debtor is a State enterprise.
COMPLAINTS
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment in her favour. She further complained about a violation of her property rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
THE LAW
On 14 February 2006 the Court received the following declaration, signed by the applicant’s representative:
“I, Mr Vladislav Nikolayevich BYCHKOVSKIY, note that the Government of Ukraine are prepared to pay the judgment debt still owed to Ms Olga Nikolayevna Voronko, as well as to pay her ex gratia the sum of EUR 1,240 with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights.
The sum of EUR 1,240 will be converted into the national currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the [decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1] of the European Convention on Human Rights. From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Ukraine in respect of the facts of this application. I declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case.
This declaration is made in the context of a friendly settlement which the Government and the applicant have reached.”
On 8 February 2006 the Court received the following declaration from the Government:
“I, Iryna SHEVCHUK, Head of the Office of the Government Agent before the European Court of Human Rights, declare that the Government of Ukraine offer to pay the judgment debt still owed to Ms Olga Nikolayevna Voronko, as well as to pay her ex gratia the sum of EUR 1,240 with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights.
The sum of EUR 1,240 will be converted into the national currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the [decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1] of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.”
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Claudia WesterdiekPeer Lorenzen
RegistrarPresident
[1] At the material time EUR 600.41
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy