.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt }.s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right }.sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }.s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify }.s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt }.s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid }.s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid }.s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }.sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }
Published on 8 July 2024
FOURTH SECTION
Application no. 10761/16
Mher YENOKYAN
against Armenia
lodged on 22 February 2016
communicated on 5 April 2019 and 18 June 2024
The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC.
QUESTION
Did the conditions of the applicant’s detention from the date of his arrest on 13 July 1996 until October 2005 amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (see, in particular, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 136-41, ECHR 2016)?
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy