24.10.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 392/17
Appeal brought on 12 August 2016 by Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, S.L. against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 2 June 2016 in Joined Cases T-426/10 to T-429/16 and T-438/12 to T-441/12, Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías and Others v Commission
(Case C-459/16 P)
(2016/C 392/21)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Appellant: Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, S.L. (represented by: F. González Díaz, A. Tresandi Blanco and V. Romero Algarra, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—
set aside the judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2016 in Cases T-426/10 to T-429/10 and, in particular, in Case T-428/10, Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC v Commission;
—
order the Commission to pay the costs incurred in both the present proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court.
Grounds of appeal and main arguments
1.
The General Court erred in law by applying an incorrect legal standard when it held that Tycsa PSC formed an economic unit with MRT since Trenzas y Cables, the company that held a 100 % shareholding in Tycsa PSC, ceased to exist and MRT is not the successor of Trenzas y Cables.
2.
The General Court erred in law in failing to apply the appropriate legal standard and failed to state reasons in that it did not explain why the sworn statements of the managing directors o
